08 03

82nd Academy Awards Winners

Posted by ptb under *like, Movies | Leave a Comment |

Over the last few weeks, one of our new writers, Ryan, gave us his thoughts about the nominees for Best Picture (here and here) as well as his predictions for a total of 10 categories at this year’s Oscars.  The show was last night, all the winners have been announced, how did he do?  Ryan managed to hit 9 out of 10 from his prediction list, and got all the big awards.

While anyone could argue that these were easy calls to make, I disagree. Particularly in the case of Best Picture and Best Actress as Avatar and The Hurt Locker had fairly close odds as did Sandra Bullock and Meryl Streep at Point-Spreads, Gambling 911, and Sharp Bettor (I guess people really do bet on these things).  I wouldn’t have been able to get nine right, but that’s why we had Ryan contribute his thoughts on the awards. He didn’t even need to see every movie.

I just don’t know why he didn’t throw out a pick for Best Foreign Language Film. Anyone could see ‘El Secreto de Sus Ojos‘ was a sure thing.  Or is it funnier to say ‘The Young Victoria‘ was a shoe-in for Best Costume Design?

Distract others:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
07 03

Identify Yourself Readers

Posted by Angelique under *dislike, Technology | Join The Discussion |

You know who you are.  I like to call you blog stalkers.  You look at everything, everyday, methodically.  Don’t get me wrong – I love that we have an audience.  Really, I do.  I blog for the attention.  I can’t deny it.  BUT!  Something I have always loved about blogging is the interaction.  You don’t interact.  You read, you read some more, and then you read again and then you click links and read even more.  Clearly – you are interested in what we have to say….so why not interact?  You know who you are.  Mr. (or Ms.) Cambridge Entrepreneurial Network, I am calling you out.  Comment for Pete’s sake.  Well – for mine too….because frankly….the googling of my name all the time is creeping me out.

Distract others:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
04 03

REVIEW: Justice! League Cry for Justice! #7

Posted by KevinMLD under *dislike, Comics | 3 Comments |

Cry for Justice! launched on the heels of Final Crisis with Green Lantern Hal Jordan and Green Arrow deciding they needed to seek revenge… Scratch that Justice!… for the deaths of guys like the Martian Manhunter at hands of supervillians in recent years. The two heroes form their own seperate Justice! League to proactively dish out their new brand of Justice!

The book was originally announced as a second ongoing Justice! League title to be written by James Robinson. The series was mercifully shortened to just seven issues. Robinson has since, however, taken over the main ongoing JLA book. Spoilers below…

Since the publication of the first issue of CFJ! the book has been controversial. Fourth-tier DC characters were killed off seemingly without regard. The dialogue was at times ridiculously bad and the whole package desperately sought to be edgy. Hell, several supporting characters never even interacted with the books stars and had no reason for being in the series at all.

As the story progressed, I took it all in with a grain of salt because the art looked kind of nice and it all seemed to be done in the name of turning the villain Prometheus into an upper tier force in the DC Universe.

I’m always in favor of more top heels.

The final issue of the series landed yesterday and proved every single one of the book’s naysayers correct.

I really don’t know what DC was thinking with this one.

This book destroyed virtually the entire Green Arrow universe.

GA’s former sidekick Speedy, also known at one point as Arsenal and most recently known as JLA member Red Arrow, had his arm torn off. That’s a pretty big problem for an archer, but DC can always tack on a cyborg arm ala the Winter Soldier or Cable.

Why? Because it’s edgy.

Speedy’s most interesting characteristic has always been that he was a single father doing his best to raise the daughter, Lian, that he fathered with the supervillain Cheshire. Lian is a decades old character though maybe only six years old in continuity. (People age oddly in comics.)

Of course the most noted casualty in CFJ! had to be this little girl. The only interesting part of Speedy’s character is gone.

Why? Because it’s edgy.

Robinson went further by destroying GA’s hometown likely killing millions.

Why? Because it’s edgy.

All of this would have been a major price to pay to push Prometheus back up to the upper echelon of DC villains, but most troublesome of all, CFJ! ends with Green Arrow firing an arrow through Prometheus’ skull and basically nailing his face to a wall.

Why? Because it’s edgy.

It’s bad enough that the biggest developments in Green Arrow’s life since his own death and resurrection happened not in his own title but in a Justice! League mini-series… But what did any of this accomplish? Producing a suddenly edgier Green Arrow?

Why didn’t they kill Black Canary and Connor Hawke while they were at it? That would have been really edgy. Hell, for all I know Hawke may already be dead. Who can keep score?

DC has promised to follow up on this story throughout the Spring, but CFJ! has generated nothing but cheap heat and I can’t imagine people will buy those follow-up books en masse.

Ulimately, I know some of this stuff will be written out of DC continuity in the years to come War Games-style. It has to be. It’s all too stupid. But that just serves to cheapens the DC universe even further.

Cry for Justice! should never have been published.

Distract others:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
04 03

REVIEW: The Hot Tub Time Machine

Posted by KevinMLD under *like, Movies | Leave a Comment |

The Hot Tub Time Machine is one of those movies like Snakes on a Plane in which the title of the film explains everything you need to know about the film’s plot. Everyone walking into the theater to see it knows in advance that the movie is stupid. If you think you’re heading to see an intellectual film, then you yourself are stupid.

John Cusack, playing a character named Adam, leads a cast of three middle aged friends who have drifted apart and have realized that none of their lives have turned out the way they hoped. When Adam’s old friend Lou (Rob Corddry) tries to kill himself while rocking out to Motley Crue, Adam and Nick (the American Office’s Craig Robinson) decide to take him away to a ski resort that they had frequented in their youth to give him a chance to relax. This is an oddly dark way to kick off the adveture.

They are joined on the trip by Adam’s nerdy young nephew Jacob, played by Clark Duke, who is detested by Lou.

After a night of crazy partying, one thing leads to another and the four find themselves transported back to 1986 and hijinks ensue.

The most important question about any film like this, of course, is by what time travel rules do they play?

Lost?

Terminator?

Back to the Future?

Bill and Ted?

Apparently, the characters are convinced they must follow the rules of the Butterfly Effect (a movie I skipped) to make sure they don’t ruin their futures. Can these middle aged versions of themselves succeed in replicating their youthful behavior? Will they destroy the world if they fail?

The film continues Chevy Chase’s comeback tour as he shows up as a funny and mysterious hot tub repairman and also features a hysterical running gag featuring former-Back to the Future costar Crispin Glover.

In the end, is the movie funny?

Hell yeah.

Everyone is comparing this flick to the Hangover because that was funny and remarkably successful recently, but I think I enjoyed the pure madness of HTTM more.

Distract others:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon
26 02

Oscar Night in America, week three

Posted by Ryan under *mixed, Movies | 2 Comments |

Over the last two weeks, I’ve discussed this year’s Academy Award nominees for Best Picture as part of  MLD’s Oscar preview. The last part of the wonderful little piece on movies is for award predictions. I have not seen all of the films, so my list is very subjective based on what I have read in the papers. I’ll also discuss the movies that will be most remembered from the past year. Every year movies get nominated for best picture and forgotten soon afterward. These movies will stand the test of time as the best films of 2009.

Oscar Predictions:
Best Picture:  The Hurt Locker
Best Director:  Kathryn Bigelow, The Hurt Locker
Best Actor:  Jeff Bridges, Crazy Heart
Best Supporting Actor:  Christoph Waltz, Inglourious Basterds
Best Actress:  Sandra Bullock, The Blind Side
Best Supporting Actress:  Mo’Nique, Precious
Best Animated Film:  Up!
Best Original Screenplay:  Quentin Tarantino, Inglourious Basterds
Best Adapted Screenplay:  Geoffrey Fletcher, Precious
Best Visual Effects:  Avatar

You can take these guesses with a grain of salt.    I’ll be watching Star Trek more than The Hurt Locker and Avatar combined.  It just is what it is.  Here are a few other movies that were not nominated for Best Picture, but you will gladly put on ahead of most of the garbage listed above:

(In no particular order)

The Hangover
Everyone already saw this movie, but it will be watched again and again. It will be on TNT nearly every weekend, like how Wedding Crashers is on it now. This movie will be dead to us in five years, but until that point it will be THE comedy of the year.

World’s Greatest Dad
Robin Williams is so great in this movie. You have to just let this movie play out. You can watch it on Netflix Instant View. It is really amazing what he does with it. It is not for everyone, but World’s Greatest Dad is one of the more disturbing/entertaining movies of the year. Maybe this one will never be widely watched, but I hope it is.

Zombieland
This was the best comedy of the year.  It was better than The Hangover, though that is no slight against The Hangover.  That was funny.  Zombieland is that movie that you waited too long to see, whenever it is you may see it.  You should have saw it earlier and its your fault.  Woody Harrelson, after this movie and his Oscar nominated role in The Other Side, will hopefully have a resurgence that will hopefully include Kingpin 2.  Isn’t Vanessa Angel dead?  She’s gotta be.  Oh, and Zombieland has “The Cameo.”

Drag Me To Hell

This movie has you from the first scene.  You smile the whole way through.

Big Fan

I have never been so uncomfortable while watching a movie.  I had to pause it a couple times just to get through the strip club scene… and its not for the reasons you think.  I cannot believe they offered him a drink.  It is just a weird movie.

Moon

Moon and District 9 are the two smart sci-fi movies of the year.  Moon was hardly released, which is too bad.  It is better than District 9.

I know there are others.  I loved Fantastic Mr. Fox and Observe and Report.  I’ve been told Away We Go is good.  Same for (500) Days of Summer, but I’ll pass if it is a straight rip off of Annie Hall. Some people loved Where the Wild Things Are, The Cove, In the Loop, and many many others, so the above is an incomplete list.  I’m sure I missed one… eh hem… Crank: High Voltage.

The Oscars will be televised next Sunday, March 7 at 8pm on ABC.

Go to Oscar Night In America, week two.

Distract others:
  • Facebook
  • Digg
  • Twitter
  • MySpace
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • del.icio.us
  • Google Bookmarks
  • StumbleUpon